Reclaiming The Language

There are certain words in the English language that have been commandeered by our collective enemy, weaponized and then used against us to promote our destruction.

Our enemy is the Judaic inspired left, the liberals, and the Marxists. The progenitors of which have been pursuing us for two thousand years.

In this article, I want to address some of these important button words for the purpose of reclaiming them back into the common lexicon of English words and phrases. The power of these weaponized words is immense and should not be underestimated.

Currently, we are bludgeoned into silence with the words of our own language. Our forbearance, empathy and consideration for the opinion of others has been taken advantage of to the point that we are on the brink now of the irretrievable disappearance of ethnic Europeans.

The task of reclaiming our language is vitally important if we are ever to regain the freedom to  effectively defend ourselves against the spurious slurs and false allegations made against us.

Some of these so weaponized words would include the following
Race, Conspiracy, Fanatic, Hate, Extremist and even the word “White” when used in the context of denoting our race.

Race,- Racist, Racism
First I will look at some dictionary definitions, old and new to see what has happened to the word over time.
From the 1981 edition of The Living Webster Encyclopaedic dictionary of the English language;

1. A group of persons connected by common descent or origin. A family tribe or people.
2. A major division of mankind characterised by a combination of certain physical traits which are genetically transmitted.
3. A group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic stock.
4. The condition of belonging to a particular people or stock.  

Comparing older definitions of the word Race to newer online dictionary definitions reveals something very strange. The word itself has come to be treated with disdain and contempt.

The Wikipedia entry points out that the word has fallen out of use in favour of less emotionally charged words.
The dictionary dot com definition of Race describes Race as "supposedly distinctive physical characteristics" and an “…arbitrary classification of humans”

These disclaimers and riders are a not so subtle attempt to push aside the obvious biological facts. According to this politically distorted view of reality, the obvious differences between the Australian Aboriginal and your blue-eyed Scandinavian are only “supposedly distinctive”.

The modern dictionary definition does not reflect reality, rather it is designed to serve a specific political and ideological agenda.

In this paradigm, the dictionary has ceased to be a reference and lexicon of the English language and has fallen to the exigencies of propaganda. At some point, we have to insist on the truth. There has to be some level of our culture where we can trust that truth has been respected. If not then we unwind and handicap our culture. We have to keep peeling back the layers of corrupted intellectual endeavour in search of a foundation upon which we can once again begin to build up the pillars of our intellectual foundation.

That is what this effort is about. Weeding out from our language words and structures that have been corrupted for political gain. They take our clear and explicit language and make out of it a noose for our own neck.

So I claim right here that Race is good, Race is right, Race exists and to acknowledge that obvious fact should be the most normal and rational observation. To be a Race-ist means simply that you recognise this self-evident fact.

Racism is simply the ideological position that races exist and have a right to pursue their own best interests. The true meaning of Racist should contain no negative connotations at all. The word has been deliberately loaded with emotional blackmail in an attempt to force white people to deny their own Race.

Before one can fight for the continued existence of a racial group you first have to acknowledge that race as a human biological reality exists.
I envisage a time when a Negro, a Chinese, an Arab and a White can all proclaim clearly that they are racists in a spirit of respect and cooperation. Each acknowledging the Racial integrity of the other and being free to pursue the cultural interests of their own people.
White Europeans are encouraged to believe that the very concept of race is false, but only when it is applied to Whites.
Resources;
http://www.renegadetribune.com/california-newsreel-race-illusion/

White
Incredibly, even the word that denotes our race has been loaded with negative sentiment that tries to put Europeans on the defensive and apologise for just existing.
One of the fabricated red hearings used to fool weak minded people into going along with the plan of genocide for Europeans is the idea that Race was the root cause of the European wars. And that the only way to maintain world please is to annihilate all the White people!  That’s all of them, not just the ethnic Germans as proposed by Theodore  Kaufman in his 1941 book “Germany Must Perish”, but all of them, wherever they can be found.

It is true that the history of Europe is a history of Wars just the same as the histories of any other people are sagas of conflict and strife. However these are not Race wars, they are dynastic wars or Religious wars or wars created and fought for the profit of the ruling elite. Particularly the two world wars of the twentieth century were fratricidal wars of unparalleled destruction fought for reasons of geopolitical strategy and profit.

To offer as a solution to the problem of war, the deliberate annihilation of the borders and peoples of Europe is the most horrific and unspeakable proposition in all of human history. These people actually believe that the deliberate extermination of the apex civilisation on the planet is a good way forward to world peace!   It is the people who create these wars that need to be dealt with not the people who fought and died in them.

Resources
http://www.dailystormer.com/they-are-really-pushing-race-mixing/
https://youtu.be/RoKl47nK04M David Duke on the decline of the White race.



Conspiracy.
noun, plural conspiracies.
1.  the act of conspiring.
2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose:
He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.

The new "establishment" inflexion to the definition is that anyone so tarred with the label of "conspiracy theorist" is also a nutjob loony that no one should take any notice of, unless you too want to be seen as a nutjob looney as well.



This redefinition is clever in that it relies on individual ego for its effectiveness.  No one wants to be ostracised or thought of as stupid. The effort here is to portray someone with a theory the government doesn't like, or an idea that will expose government criminality, as an idiot. If they can discredit the individual rather than deal directly with his allegations they can drive away his support base on the basis of personal ego alone.

The effect is that real conspiracies like Guy Fawkes can no longer be discussed without looking like a complete looney!

This approach should be countered simply by sticking to the truth.  The point at issue is the truth of any allegation. Just because one allegation of conspiracy may turn out to be false, does not mean that all conspiracies are therefore false.  It's like assuming that because bananas are shipped in boats, therefore, all boats are banana boats.  It shows an incredible degree of intellectual laziness.


Extremist
Prior to the first world war, the views held today by Racial realists and nationalists would have been considered completely normal and mainstream.  Yet now, with the total penetration of left-wing and Marxist ideology through all the institutions of the western world, the Overton Window of acceptable points of view has been moved so far to the left that the once normal and healthy regard for your own people and country is considered the most hateful and evil thing in the world.  If you could transport a regular British citizen of that period through a hole in space-time onto one of the liberal university campuses of 2016 he would be shocked and amazed to find himself being "accused" of being a racist.  He would be like "what? You mean your not? Why not?"  "Race" for him, is taken as a self evident fact. It's independent of good or bad, and to believe in the concept cannot possibly have any effect on one's moral standing.

Once again, do not buckle to peer pressure. State boldly and clearly your position and let the light of truth and reason destroy their false ideology.

Hate
Everyone thinks hate is such a bad thing. And we are always told to eschew hate at all costs. "Do not allow hate to eat you up", and "don't allow hate in your heart".   But there is another side to hate. Hate is a normal and very powerful emotion, it can drive a man to action when fear of physical harm or failure would normally paralyse his mind and his body.

The liberals in their pathological altruism claim they are incapable of hate. If that is true then they only advertise their place in the line of sitting ducks. Waiting for their turn at the hands of the next criminal. Do you not hate the man who comes to rape and kill your wife? What about those that would do harm to your children, are you going to say you don't hate them? Or the government departments that steal your property and interfere with your family, are you completely indifferent to these people?

Now we have Hate Speach and Hate Crime legislation.  These are simply the tools of tyrannical governments to shut down dissent and free speech.

Remember the quote from Orwell and speak.  "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

 Kai Murros on Hate

Why must we fight?

The following text served as the basis for an address given at Speakers Corner, Albert Park. Auckland on Tuesday 13^th December 2016.

Pease is always the easiest option.

Weather on the personal, national, or even on a racial and cultural level. Even the aggressor wants peace; “Just give me your stuff”, “step aside and let us in”  or “stop complaining, you deserve it anyway”. Yes, peace is easy to achieve and maintain. All that is required is a complete lack of national and cultural identity.

When you have no nation, and no race and when all that is left is Homo Economicus, a type of deracinated humanoid island existing in an atomised society in which every single human being is regarded by the state and himself as an island distinct from all the other human islands surrounding him and in corporate jargon regarded as a "human resource" or in the jargon of the state as a unit of work and consumption, this, in place of the racially defined man of the Nation, then, in that case, it makes no difference who occupies what territory, even the very notion of a country seems obsolete.  And so in such a paradigm to rise up in armed defence of your territory against an invading army would seem equally ridiculous. They are "People" of course just like us and whether they come armed with swords scimitars or smiles they are still just people.

But we live in a time of discovery. We are discovering something about ourselves. That there is something about ourselves that is hard wired. We are discovering that even after 70 years of liberal Zionist propaganda there is something hard-wired about us that even we didn’t know couldn’t be changed. We are different, and some of us are only now just starting to realise how different we are.

The European people are creative beyond comparison. Not every single member of our race obviously, but year on year, appear amongst us artists, inventors, scientists, engineers architects and philosophers and doctors and musicians who have advanced the cause of human thought and civilisation. Completely outstripping any other branch of humanity. And now after thousands of years of achievement in every field of human endeavour, we have allowed ourselves to be persuaded to feel bad about it!

We have our failings, of course, we have become soft, introspective gullible and naïve to an absurd and ridiculous degree. But we are discovering something about ourselves. That we are still all the things we have always been. We are discovering these things about ourselves because we have been forced by our adversaries to ask some very disturbing questions. We have for years been encouraged not to think of ourselves as a race, yet now we can see quite clearly that we are being attacked as a race on a global scale. Why? And by whom?  There is only one constant in the open and global drive for mass immigration. All White countries and only White countries are being targeted and slated for destruction!

And why would any person,  group or entity seek to wipe us out globally in every country on earth all at the same time? The only conclusion we can arrive at is that they want us gone simply because of the threat we pose to them and their plans by our continued existence. Regardless of how outlandish or ridiculous that may sound, we cannot escape the practical realities of what is happening.

After eight years of our Jewish prime minister Key in New Zealand, the communist Merkel in Germany, Jewish Cameron in London and African-American Obama in the US, white people the world over are waking up to the fact that if we are to survive as an ethnic identity at all, then we are going to have to become the very thing they accuse us of being in order to justify our demise.

I’m talking of course about the accusations of “white supremacist”, "Racist" and complaints of "white oppression".  How do the people that make these spurious accusations suppose the wealth of white European countries came about? They like to pretend that the wealth of white countries is a fact independent of the people who produced it. Was it just luck, and if black explorers from Africa had found Australia then they too would have inherited the lucky country?   No.  There is a self-fulfilling nature to these accusations because they force us to think about how our wealth and civilization came about. It came about because of who we are. It's what we do as a racial group that makes the difference.

And now the waking White Race stands with it's back against the wall, sick and tired of being taken advantage of and apologizing for existing. We face an existential threat and in the bloody world of conquest and survival and because no one ever fought to the death for the right to be average, we, therefore, of necessity MUST believe that we are a race that is worthy of survival and we MUST declare our primacy over the territory we call ours. And that, by definition makes us who would live, White supremacists!

And so from now on, we will brush off these asinine slurs, the childish petulance of all the useful idiots of the Marxist left, and say to all white men of character it's time to grow up, grow a pair, stand up and defend our people.

And finally a reminder about our eternal enemy. Do not underestimate him, he may come to you as a lamb in distress, preying on your natural empathy but beware; our eternal enemy is highly organised, totally dedicated, absolutely ruthless and he will never ever stop.

Macatak

Albert Park Address

What follows is the text that served as the basis for an address given at "speakers corner" in Albert Park, Auckland on the 6th December 2016.

People of Auckland, we need to talk!

There is a crime being committed here in this city and across the nation.  It is a crime that occurs daily and weekly, and by the month. It is a slow creeping crime that stares us in the face every day and rots the soul of our country, leaving us with something that we never expected or asked for, and certainly never voted for.

The United Nations definition of genocide includes the act of deliberately inflicting on a group, conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

Remember that legal definition when you travel around this city, and the towns and cities of our country. And remember it when you are being crowded out of your towns and cities by an avalanche of foreigners and when our children have to compete for a place in school with the children of thousands of immigrants brought into our country in only the last 3 years.

These are precisely the conditions of life that qualify as a deliberate act of ethnic genocide under the 1948 genocide convention resolution 260.

Now, before I am shouted down with the usual tirade of racist abuse let me say I have nothing against the people who come here. They are for the most part only doing the very best they can for themselves and their families. And if the situation were reversed, I’m sure I would do all I could, to get myself and the rest of my family into India for example, so that I could take advantage of the wonderful society that the Indian people had created for themselves. So that I might be able to take advantage of all kinds of benefits the Indian people receive,  like for example, free education, or free health care, or unemployment benefits, or a sickness benefit, or if I have an accident, then compensation for injury. Or cheap government funded housing. Obviously, I would have to be a complete idiot to not try and get into India in any way I could, if the situation were reversed.

However the situation is not reversed, and it is our small nation of new Zealand that only recently past the four million mark that is being force fed an indigestible diet of people from parts of the world that have absolutely nothing in common with the European cultural heritage of new Zealand.

Rather, by beef is with our own government.  The Key government has, without consultation or consideration of the will of the people, taken it upon itself, to act upon the same left wing liberal ideology that is currently laying waste to so much of Europe.

The usual thin threadbare and inadequate excuses will no longer pacify a New Zealand public that is sick to death of being ignored.  We are told that we “need” immigration to provide all the skills required for our growing economy. Or simply that we need more of these generic “people” to provide for the growth of the economy. And of course, we must never question the Keynesian economic dogma of growth.

Even though now we have the immigrants, but where is the growth?
Even though now we have the immigrants, but where are the skills that justified their arrival?

Wake up People! We’ve been sold a pack of lies for a political agenda.

No government has ever been elected with a mandate to engage in social engineering on such a massive and far-reaching scale,  based as it is, on a foreign and suicidal ideology.

There has never been a society or culture that has been able to withstand such massive racial mixing and yet still retain its cultural identity.

The problem here is that the ideological idiots in charge of New Zealand are so culturally bankrupt that they do not even consider that we even have a cultural identity in the first place.
And what I am here today to say is that we do!
The government does not even know what a country is, but we do.

And what I want to do today is send the government a message that the people are prepared to fight to preserve our culture and our country. The first action in this fight is the petition to reduce immigration numbers to 20000 per year with preference given to culturally compatible applicants. This is a common sense approach that would be considered completely normal in any non-white country.

So when the usual hysterical accusations come from the liberal left. We say clearly that we are a people and a country, and we will not be ignored.

Thank you for listening.

Now that we have Trump...

I should have listened to my mother; "you should be careful what you wish for, you just might get more than you bargained for"!

Millions of white Americans and millions of concerned whites all around the world were rooting for a Donald Trump victory, and they got it.

They knew implicitly that this was it. A last chance; a watershed moment in white survival. If Clinton got in the floodgates would open, and our future as a subjugated minority would arrive.

Rightly or wrongly, whether it was a miss-guided hope or not, white people identified with Trump. But incredibly, in public interviews, the issue of race was barely mentioned. People preferring to couch their support for Mr Trump in terms of his economic and business acumen. Or base as they would, their support for his campaign on his controversial immigration policy or his apparently radical idea that illegals should be detained and repatriated.

Very very few people, even now at this late stage in the collapse of our civilisation, are prepared to use the “R” word to promulgate the idea of a White European focused leadership of the USA. God forbid that anyone should suffer to be called a dreaded “Racist”!

In a social paradigm of massive reverse racism, population replacement, with abortion freely available and race mixing promoted widely through the corporate media. Any white person with the courage to stand up for his people faces the immediate threat of slanderous accusations. He will be called a "Nazi", and a "racist" and a "white supremacist!" For such obvious fallacies to be propounded through the media indicates that our fifth estate has either fallen victim en-mass to a false and suicidal doctrine or it has been bought and paid for by; not just a foreign power, but rather, a specific racial enemy.

If I had been an American, or perhaps even just an illegal alien as apparently now that is all that is required in order to be able to vote in the US, if you intend to register Democrat, I would have voted Trump because a vote for Hillary would so obviously be a vote for surrender.

Semaphore Signal

Trump's success at the polls has been a semaphore signal to whites the world over; a pause in the weather, a break in the battle or a change in the wind, or to those on the front lines a cool rain in a blazing inferno.
Collectively I can almost hear it “maybe…maybe we will be allowed to live…!”

How justified these vain hopes are, really doesn’t matter at this point. Anything that will put wind in the sails of the handful of serious white leaders we have worldwide is a good thing.
It may even bring more people out of the woodwork to be believers and even leaders in the cause.

Caveats on the cause. 

But the caveats I have on my support for Trump are as follows;
1. He has not come out explicitly in support of white Americans. Our support of him is based on us liberally reading into his words and somewhat hopefully between his lines.
2. He has not recognised the issue of white disenfranchisement. He has spoken specifically About Muslims – in connection with terrorism
And Mexicans  - in connection with illegal immigration and jobs and crime.
3. He is pro gay rights. Homosexuality is an anomalous reality of the human condition. There have been famous homosexuals in our history and whilst I do not advocate legislation to actively conspire or discriminate against the "gay" community, there is a gulf of difference between the acceptance of the condition on the one hand and actively promoting homosexuality as a viable or even desirable lifestyle on the other. Something the left has been doing for years with predictably disastrous effects on our culture.
4. He is the most pro-Israel candidate in US political history. This is the most serious problem with Donald Trump from a European survivalist point of view. He famously told AIPAC that he didn’t want their money and I think on that basis a lot of whites have deliberately closed their ears and eyes to Mr Trumps wildly over the top and sycophantic stance on any and all issues pertaining to Jews and Israel.

A well-honed racket 

The Jews are well organised, and always plan many years ahead. All four of Trump's adult children are either married to or partnered with Jews. Just in the last few weeks, his first grandson underwent the despicable practice of Jewish male genital mutilation.  Otherwise known as circumcision.
If Mr Trump is not already beholden to our Zionist overlords, then they at least have their people on the inside.  It is the same well-honed racket they have been running for centuries, the book of Esther being a case in point.

Surround the king; get your people into key positions of influence and if possible marry your people into the king's family and most of all seek to marry one of your daughters to the king himself.

Our people for thousands of years have habitually underestimated our eternal enemy. They are highly organised, totally dedicated to their own advancement, absolutely ruthless in the pursuit of their aims, and they will never, ever stop.

Our man in the white house may not be bought and paid for yet, but with Donald Trump in the White House this degree of Zionist influence translates to control and therefore power and Donald may only discover he has a leash around his neck when one day he strays a little too far from the acceptable range of pro-Jewish policy decisions. From our Zionist controller's point of view, I can well imagine Sheldon Adelson's response to the debacle of the 2016 election cycle “heads I win tails you lose”. Same trick different century.

The implications of this reality for our people are horrific. Because of the nature of our enemy, eventually, it will be either us or them. Matter and antimatter, only one can exist in the same place at the same time.  At this point in this aeon spanning death struggle, they are winning.

Becoming Ourselves and the nature of war.

A permanent solution will only ever be achieved if we are first able to overcome ourselves. We will need to become something we have never been in order to do something we have never done.

Our enemy is using against us the finest weapon they could find, one tailor made to destroy a people who value truth, beauty, logic and creativity. A people who value love and nature, who have empathy with the natural world and who are the sentient expression of it.

That weapon they use against us to such devastating effect is, of course, our own basic nature. And that is the thing we must learn to overcome if we are ever to defeat our eternal nemesis.
The question then for us is “how do we become something we are not in order to defeat an enemy that is using our own nature to destroy us"?

We are fighting for the essence, fighting to remain what we are, but in order to win, must we become something we are not and in so doing, do we not do our enemies job for him? Having won in this way can we still claim to be the people we fought to preserve? Must we do our enemies work for him? Defeating who we are first so that we might defeat him more perfectly?

It is not a matter of defeating what we are, but rather a matter of discovering and releasing what we have always been.

Even in this time of apparent weakness, the best of us are the best there is. It has always been this way, and this is primordial. We can do survival, but a decision is required first. The Jews have achieved an incredible cultural coup in convincing over a period of seven decades an advanced global civilisation of the meritorious benefits of ethnic annihilation.

It isn't a matter of defeating who we are but rather a question of peeling back the multi-layered labyrinth of lies and deceptions to a point where a white man anywhere on this earth can think clearly and without reservation about who he is, the race he is part of and his role in this world.

So what does the election of Donald J Trump mean for the survival of white Europeans as a distinct racial identity?  It means we still need the same solid leadership we needed before. We still need to wake up enough of our people worldwide to make a difference, we still need discipline, organisation, planning and a strategy for success that includes specific goals.

In other words, nothing has changed, but it may be that in years  to come we may look back at the Trump election and say "That was the spark that lit the fire of revolution that saved us."

Macatak

The White Man’s Reading List

Every great revolution needs its academics and philosophers as well as a large contingent of enthusiastic foot soldiers. The leading Bolsheviks knew Marx chapter and verse,  they had the theory and philosophy of communism down pat complete with its mandatory genocides and totalitarianism.

Any movement that hopes to be around longer than a street riot will need a central cadre of dedicated and highly educated men with a deep understanding of the issues.  They must live and breath the movement and its philosophy, understanding both its aims as well as its methods. 

They must also know their enemy, as well as they know themselves.  If you cannot correctly identify the enemy and do not have an effective plan to destroy it, your movement will fail!
To that end, I present the White Mans Reading List. Taken from my own collection of books and ebooks, this is not exhaustive but it’s a good start.

Mein Kampf. A Hitler	Adolf Hitler's classic, essential reading for anyone wanting to peel away the layers of post-war propaganda and outright lies surrounding the leader of National Socialist Germany.
The Creature From Jekyll Island. E Griffin	A broad strokes tour of the last 100 years of deceit and deception.  Reveals the same power behind the Bolsheviks and the Fed.
Who We Are. W Pierce	Why has our European culture been so easily undermined? Quite simply because no one ever told us the material in this book. Read it and stand tall!
Western Civilisation Bites Back. J Bowden	When Jonathan Bowden died prematurely in 2012 the white Renaissance movement lost a powerful orator and gifted literary genius.  This book is a collection of his most well-known speeches.
Judaism Discovered. M Hoffman	A huge and scholarly work designed for both a Jewish and Gentile audience. Hoffmann digs deep into the Babylonian Talmud to reveal the godless religion of our racial nemesis.
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. E. Michael Jones	Jones goes into amazing detail, probably too much detail, tracking two thousand years of Jewish scheming to overthrow and corrupt European Civilisation.  In the final analysis, they have been doing this for so long now that they simply can not help themselves.
Breaking The Spell. Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom	I have called the Jewish Holocaust the capstone issue of the post-war dispensation. It is the single enabling dogma beneath which all the other suicidal dogmas work there homicidal magic. The idea that Hitler was the most evil man that ever lived, That National Socialism is also therefore evil, That all white people are evil by association... But what if I told you that the basic premise upon which the traditional Holocaust narrative is based is either wildly exaggerated or cut entirely from whole cloth, all for the purpose of political and financial gain. Read this and the other books in the series to draw back the curtain on the greatest mass deception of all time.
Debating The Holocaust. T Dalton Phd	The Holocaust has been the untouchable issue of our time. This book is part of a thirty-two books set produced by independent experts in their respective areas.
The Gulag Archipelago. A Solzhenitsyn	How bad can things get if we do nothing?  Solzhenitsyn’s famous work provides an unequivocal answer.

The Art of Persuasion

How to talk to people about white genocide.

Many people we come into contact with on a daily basis have absolutely no idea of the planned fate of the White Race. Without knowing it they are completely immersed in the liberal Marxist agenda; the government tells the truth, the 6 o'clock news is an accurate and unbiased assessment of world events and if we just trust the government then everything will work out fine...

So how does one bring people along to a position that many of us have spent years to get to?

This is an incredibly difficult task. Should one attempt to synthesise years of study and learning into a few simple sentences and then just dump all that information into the brain of the unsuspecting agent we happen to be confronted with? (I say Agent, because just like in the movie, anyone who has not yet been Red Pilled is still effectively working for the machine).

Or do you work in baby steps, connecting with your Agent on an emotional level to introduce the truth serum to them one small concept at a time?

To answer these questions it depends on the individual. It also depends on how much time you have with the individual and whether you are going to be able to talk with them again. 
 

General rules on engagement.

1. Stay calm. They may give you reason to lose it, but don't. Your mission is bigger than that.
2. Don't alienate them by showing them up or making them look stupid.
3. Simply point the way so that they can find the truth for themselves. Help them to see the logical fallacies and inconsistencies in their arguments.
4. Don't try to counter EVERY false statement or interjection. Almost everything they think they know is wrong. Decide on the basic point you wish to make and stick to it. Attempting to counter every statement made will have you jumping from issue to issue fending off attacks from all directions. You will get frustrated, lose your cool and look like a crank.   

For every person we fail with there is a ripple effect that can cost the lives of our people down the track. But the reverse is also true. For each person red pilled we move closer to the goal of building a groundswell of public opinion from which will come the movement to change the world and save our people.

First Impressions USA

After three weeks into a five-week stint working in America, I have to admit that even without any strong pre-conceptions about what to expect I am still surprised by what I have found.

I'm in California, I was told before I left New Zealand that there were lots of Mexicans here. That is to be expected, the border is only a day's drive away, and I am sure there are many incentives to seek work in California.

I am also well aware of the political climate to open the borders and replace white populations anywhere and everywhere they can be found.  But even with that having been said I am still shocked to find how far advanced the process has become in this part of southern California.

It is not just that there are a lot of ethnically mixed or none Europeans here. The Europeans seem to be already a small and dwindling minority.  The degree of miscegenation is also very high. Anecdotally all three of the European women I saw in Me-N-Ed's collecting their pizza's had Mexican partners,- of course we are all free to make our choices of partner, but understand; these things do not happen in a vacuum, and for every white girl that marries outside her cultural group there is one less white girl available for the white man that would have been her partner.

Now I do not disparage the Mexican culture or people. I would love to travel to Mexico and experience Mexican culture first hand. The food, the music and dance. The beautiful women and the song of the people in the crucible of its creation.  But it is virtually impossible to preserve a people and its culture when it is forced to mix with a completely different culture. Both cultures become diluted, and the people find themselves cut off from the roots of their identity.

On a positive note, the Mexican culture is compatible with North American European culture through its historical and religious ties to Spain and Roman Catholicism. Something that can not be said for the Muslim hordes now entering the country.

What Country?

After a mere three weeks of watching the news and exposure to the manic commercialism that is America today, I don’t think the USA is actually a country at all; certainly not in anything like the traditional ethnocultural-linguistic and geographical sense of the word.

The definition of the word "Country" seems to be getting tacitly changed to mean whatever America has become at any given point in time, This just to maintain the illusion of nationhood that the people cling so desperately to.  Like the historical emblem that flies from so many flagpoles all over the country, it represents an idea the reality of which has long since departed these shores.

Modern America is an ethnic dumping ground and a cultural wasteland.  You can find anything you want here just as long as you don’t value the genuine or the authentic. Each facsimile of any one of the myriad social groups represented in the human morass called America is only a colourless shadow of what its parent culture would have been.

Modern America is a racial catastrophe. A deliberate genocide of white culture by any other name. Political and social discourse continuously dances around the issue, pointing this way and that always being sure not to say anything that might offend the delicate sensibilities of those who are replacing us.

They have not the first clue as to what actually constitutes a real country. They cannot–, they dare not allow their brains to go anywhere near the direction of defining a country along ethnocultural lines. The lines upon which are based any real country that ever was or will be.

The Tyranny of language.

There are only a handful of button words that serve to ring fence the solution to so many of our problems from any really effective political action.  The social power of these words is so great that
even in the unlikely event that a politician should arise that actually wants to do the right thing by his people; he can not, for fear of the power of these words.
        Words like...

• Racist
• Hitler
• Nazi
• Holocaust and 
• Auschwitz

The depth of feeling and the package of propaganda loaded into each of these words is so great as to cause a real physiological reaction in most people simply at the mention of them.

Conversely, these words make our enemies very easy to spot. They are the ones who roll out these words at the first sign of resistance to their globalist genocidal agenda.

The Pessimistic View

The article below, written in May 2016 will hopefully be followed by a more hopeful one due to recent developments in Britain and the US

Is there room for an optimistic view? Personally and in reality, I think not...

 Christianity – the moral shackles.

We may think we live in a post-Christian world. But even though that may be technically true the long shadow of Christian ethics and morality hangs over our culture affecting how we see ourselves in the world, our attitude to others and the decisions and judgments we make as individuals as well as white European countries. Whether we like it or not we are the product of our collective histories. Our sense of self-esteem and confidence as a people, if indeed we even regard ourselves as a people and our sense of obligation and responsibility in this world can be traced to the beliefs we hold to be true about ourselves, God and the stories we have been told about our history.

On the subject of our history, even the most cursory overview of the European narrative since 1945 shows that we have all – both victor and vanquished-  been tarred with the same wide brush of responsibility for every known evil in the world.  And in the absence of a viable defense against accusations of such cataclysmic and self-evident guilt, according to our own sense of Christian morality, we are duty bound to restitution and a settling of account.  In short; our race is guilty and must be punished!  This is the brilliance of the diabolical scheme to turn our own pathos, humanity, and civilization against itself unto our utter destruction. Because with the weight of guilt that has been heaped upon us, no amount of sacrifice will ever be enough to satisfy the baying hordes at the gates of Athens.

And on the subject of Christianity,- we have been sold a lemon.  There are in this world two fundamentally homicidal religions, one of them is Islam, the other one is Judaism. But we white Europeans have Christianity to encourage us to turn the other cheek, to love our enemies and to treat others as we would like to be treated ourselves. Very nice I’m sure. But as a minority population surrounded by hungry wolves bent on our annihilation, these flaccid and weak justifications of victimhood are not just a liability; they are downright suicidal.

Christianity is not a religion of strength; it is a religion of utter capitulation and weakness. The people of Europe were forced to accept this Middle Eastern religion at the point of a sword. We are promised in this dispensation only eternal damnation if we do not accept the salvation offered to us by a God in the person of a man whose regard for gentile civilization is as the dog possessions of his chosen people, his beloved Jews. (Mat 15:26)

The bait and switch million more by the Jewish rejection of Jesus, thus setting in motion two thousand years of enmity between this diabolical sect of vicious reprobates and any hapless sod that just happened to fall prey to the pernicious doctrine of Christ the Saviour!

The Jewish hate for us Christians can Master's if not fully justified by the doctrine of replacement whereby the Jewish rejection of Christ results in a wholly unexpected and shocking reversal on the part of God.

After depicting gentiles as dogs only worthy of the crumbs from the Jewish table he then, in response to their rejection of him as Lord, sacrifices the Jews to become the dogs of Mat 15:26 and raises the gentiles to the Master's table.  They weren’t expecting that!


If Europeans were to survive this war; and I certainly don’t think they will, but if in some idealised world the men of Europe were to collectively grow a pair, I believe the first thing that must be done in order to release the dormant power of the will to life is to completely throw off the shackles of Christianity.

Step out of history, into the present and claim the future.

I believe it is now incumbent upon us. Men who stand outside of Christianity that we acknowledge only that we exist and that we will fight to survive.

We can and do know all manner of factoids that attempt to provide a reason, justification or excuse for whatever action our people may or may not have taken in the past, whatever the case may be.  But instead of wasting our precious time seeking motivation from some bygone hero, we should acknowledge that whatever ancestors we had, they did not look back into their own history to find a reason for self-defense, such a proposition would appear simple-minded and self-evidently stupid. Or even worse, an act of treachery on the part of those wasting so much precious time while the enemy gathered at the gates.

No. Acknowledged imminent danger calls only for immediate action.
We have lived and prospered in Europe for thousands of years. The fact that we are here at all proves that languishing in guilt and self-doubt was never something we wasted our precious time on.

 

The Triumph of Marxism

However, we now live in a time of total defeat for the European people.  The complete victory for the Marxists over the entire white western world. Canada, the USA Europe including the British isles, Australia and New Zealand. And the defeated countries of South Africa and Rhodesia.
The work of the communists, through their instruments; cultural Marxism and critical theory have completely subjugated the intellectual consciousness of all but a few outsiders.

The attacks have come from all sides; yes, it has been a brilliant and diabolical plan. They referred to it as the “Long March”, referring to the steady subversion of all institutions that comprise a society and provide for its culture, which by extension provides for social cohesiveness and a sense of identity and community.

The predators of the western world know something about us that we don’t know but should know, and at a very deep, almost genetic level probably still do know. Even though we do our level best to suppress the nagging promptings of our primordial memory.  Like an annoying neighbor tapping constantly on the kitchen window. There is something we have forgotten but desperately need to remember. But we are just as desperate to ignore them because they are sure to confront us with facts and questions we no longer find convenient to confront.

It’s about Race, it’s always been about race. The only people who don’t think the issue is race are the gullible masses who buy into the stupid rhetoric of multiculturalism.  That would be the university graduates. Kids who are so brilliant they have learned how to hold two mutually exclusive concepts to be true at the same time.  Multiculturalism and diversity on the one hand and Miscegenation on the other.
Multiculturalism leads to diversity. Which is what? Everyone of a different race. However; a simultaneously and forcefully promoted programme of miscegenation will within only two or three generations result in a homogenous society of completely mixed racial mongrels.

You arrive back at square one, only now you have a population with no ethnic identity at all. There is no collective root or history or cultural identity. Curiously this is exactly what the Marxist agenda calls for.
Also on the subject of Miscegenation.  The idea of racial interbreeding is forcefully promoted through TV Soaps on a daily basis. Showing to our teenagers and twenty something’s in as sexually explicit detail as the law will allow that it is not only acceptable but is desirable and socially preferable for the most beautiful white European girl to have sex with an Arab or African, and even more so if they are also Muslim.

The only people who seem to be aware of the contrived nature of the situation are the few people who were already on the fringe of society. That’s the miss fits and “conspiracy theorists”. These are the people who have spent their entire lives searching for their ‘raison d'être’.  And in the course of that search found something amazing; the truth about their people.

The vast majority of the population are far too busy “fitting in” to be bothered with conspiracy theories. We all have a natural desire to be right. But the majority are so completely invested in the acceptance culture that the thought of being wrong presents as a social catastrophe. This must be avoided at all costs. To that end, no information  - no matter how well founded –can be allowed to persist if it threatens to upset the status quo.

Our people are therefore 100% committed to ignorance. They will violently defend the establishment narrative no matter how fraudulent and destructive that may be. In my own experience, the level of gullible and even criminal ignorance of even basic issues affecting us all is staggering.

Our governments see us, the people as nothing more or less than economic units of demand. Infinitely interchangeable with ANY other human units of demand on this planet.  If there is a shortage then it is a simple matter to simply bring in a few more. Perhaps a few million  more in order to build up the desired total aggregate of demand required.  We have been deliberately devolved into manageable carbon based life forms, malleable and controllable.

Can anyone believe the unbelievable?  When faced with a truly horrific and unbelievable story the rational thing to do is to disbelieve it, obviously.  In attempting to awaken our people to a reality of impending catastrophe I am faced with the reality that our people are asleep, they want to stay asleep, they do not want to be awakened and even if they are it is probably too late anyway. Anyone who tries to awaken our people is immediately abused and cursed and cast out.

As I write in May of 2016, it is apparent that absent some kind of catalyzing event our people will simply accept whatever fate the ruling elite have in mind for us.  While there are many people now who, thanks to YouTube and social media. Know a lot more about what is going on. These people still represent a very tiny percentage of our people and they offer no real world threat to our on-going global genocide.  Any small disconnected groups that do manage to coalesce into a physical presence on the street are immediately corralled, infiltrated, monitored, discredited and finally disbanded.  The enemy has learned the lesson of Mussolini and Hitler well. At every first spark of resistance; snuff it out!

What Price Farage?

The political chaos overtaking the British political system reminds me of a period of uncertainty and urgency that occurred in British politics 77 years ago.

In the last week of July 1939 in the Strand and in other prominent positions in London, large posters appeared posing the singular question ”What Price Churchill?”.

Apart from the simple question, everyone already knew the deeper implicit meaning. That being that there was a serious situation developing on the continent, and there was no one in a position of political leadership in England up to the task ahead.

That is exactly the position the British public find themselves in again today.  The double speaking Boris backstabbed by his own lieutenant.  Labour in open revolt and almost the whole lot of the so called ruling class at odds with the clear intent of the people.

There is only one man who has the steel and respect from all sides to pull off the political equivalent of the famous tablecloth trick. Simultaneously pulling the UK out of the EU whilst staving off a revolution in England and panic on the continent.

Just as happened in 1939, when the incapable in command realise they need someone to save their skin they will call on Nigel to do a job he has never desired, but for which time and experience have prepared him like no other.

Meanwhile, Putin looks on with bemused disinterest, the Americans don’t understand and the feminised British bedwetting millennial youth protest things they know nothing about.

What Price Farage?

Notes on Immigration

NewstalkZB May 16 2016
Multicultural New Zealand executive director Tayo Agunlejika (a Nigerian National) said immigration was overwhelmingly beneficial to New Zealand, and helped create a diverse and dynamic culture.
"It's a very positive thing -- it gives you a vibrant society where not everyone is the same. It comes with its own challenges, but it's good for society," he said.

One of the "Challenges" multiculturalism comes with is the fact that it doesn't work. This was admitted to by Angela Merkel in October 2010. As well the bitter years of experience in the UK and the USA.


Sunday, Dec 15, 2013
NZ Herald online “…why is the world coming home to New Zealand?”

Professor Natalie Jackson, of Waikato University, says migration is a short-term solution to keep the age structure of our population balanced. "It's a time when we need to take as many as would like to come here, and offer them citizenship to encourage them to stay in the hope they will bring other people."

Our Universities are full of people like this. They are simply incapable of thinking in terms of how societies actually work. People have been commodified, you, I and any other humanoid on this planet are completely interchangeable. No cultural or ethnic differences are allowed to exist.

Yet the curious thing is that this attitude seems only to be applied to white European countries.  You will find that all manner of exceptions to these rules are made when dealing with supposed ethnic minority groups.  

Like for instance, the Indian community, as a minority there are more than a billion people in India, all of them Indians. The same will apply to African groups or Chinese groups. The true minority group on this earth is the White European. We are about 8% and falling fast. 

But in our case, the strange solution to our low birth rate is to do everything possible to wipe us out as soon as possible.  I have trouble understanding how Miscegenation and genocide can solve the problem of low birth rates. I guess it's like accounting, if were extinct we no longer have a low birth rate.  

Stuff.co.nz  21 Aug 2015

Economists said net migration remained "extremely high" with no sign of slowing down, which would support spending and demand for houses especially in Auckland. It would also add workers to the job market and keep a lid on wages.

So how is this good for New Zealand?  House prices go up, everything else goes up due to greater demand, but immigration keeps a "lid" on wages...?

124,000

That’s one hundred and twenty-four thousand immigrants into New Zealand in the year to March 2016.

Comparing New Zealand’s rate of immigration to that of the UK, where it is a huge issue and a deciding factor affecting the upcoming Brexit vote. We find that the floodgates have been opened, and our society’s  demographics are being dramatically changed at a rate three times as fast as the continuing disaster unfolding in the UK.

According to 2015 statistics, net UK immigration was 333,000. That is a huge number but represents only 0.5% of the UK population.  New Zealand is a country of only 4.4 million, yet net immigration for the year to March 2016 was 67,619; a 1.53% increase in population in one year.   Most of these people came from India and China.

How many New Zealanders even know of the deliberate demographic changes being wrought on the people of New Zealand?  These things are never discussed or debated at large. But rather, are kept out of sight in the hope that our ideologically driven government will be able to continue unimpeded with its liberal plan for New Zealand.

The refugees question came to the fore for a while but then disappeared from view.  There was enough of an outcry about taking in 750 refugees a year. That’s our quota. We take our quota, engage in our dutiful virtue signalling and run along like good little white people.

I have already written about the philosophical leanings of the present NZ government in a piece entitled “Ethnic Affairs” on my blog.  But we need to dig deeper to find out why our elected leaders have determined to go along with the programme of white genocide emanating from Europe.  Does John Key and his National party buddies believe the Marxist propaganda, or are they simply the lapdog lackeys they appear to be; sacrificing the cultural and ethnic identity that defines us as New Zealanders for whatever crumbs are tossed their way from their bureaucratic masters in Brussels?

The Pedigree of Key

My guess is that John Key is a true believer. The man has displayed a typically cavalier attitude to the rights and liberties of new Zealanders. In fact, I have for a long time regarded our Mr Key as New Zealand's answer to George Bush. The sort of guy you could have around for a beer and a barbie. He could even be a mate of sorts. And there's no problem that can't be solved by a little sweet talk and rule bending.…But this is serious, this is the prime minister were talking about.

Are these the traits of character, intelligence, integrity and honour we should expect to find in the most senior representative of our country?  Or am I being just a bit naïve to believe that a prime minister actually represents the interests of the people who elected him?

In terms of connections. You would be hard-pressed to find a more "inside", insider than our Mr Key.
Key spent 6 years at Merrill Lynch where his stellar career took off.  He was appointed head of Global Foreign Exchange in 1995, and in 1999 he was made a member of the Foreign Exchange Committee. The Foreign Exchange Committee is interesting, intended as an advisory committee to participants in the global foreign exchange markets, this committee is manned by the top movers in international finance and banking.  And sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

It is from this stratospheric position of power and influence, not to mention the multi-million dollar salary, that in 2001 Key decided to opt out and come home to New Zealand.  The following year Key is elected to parliament as the member for the newly created electorate of Helensville.

Key’s rise to Prime Minister of New Zealand is the fastest on record at 6 years. His election victory in November 2008 was also celebrated in the Jerusalem Post with the heading “New Zealand gets third Jewish prime minister” (11/09/2008)

Sometimes you can’t tell if an apple has a maggot in it until after you take a deep bite to the core. So it is with Key. After 8 years of John Key’s government, it is clear that early fears of a swing to the right were unfounded.

The distinction between right and left in NZ politics has been rendered a farce. All the really important issues that were formally the domain of right-conservative or Left-Liberal have been surreptitiously taken off the table as issues about which any meaningful vote could realistically be taken.  Issues like immigration, foreign policy, monetary policy. Issues that affect the lives of all our people and the character of our society.

After eight years of damage John Key’s left wing, liberal bias is revealed. In 2013 he voted in Parliament for the Marriage Amendment Act which redefines marriage as “the union of 2 people regardless of their sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity”. Marriage is no longer between a man and a woman in New Zealand.  And this act more than anything else undermines the Christian basis of our culture.

His disregard for the people and the democratic system has been demonstrated still further;
The GCSB bill, passed in 2013 allowing the security agency to spy on New Zealanders was pushed through against massive public opposition.  Some polls recorded opposition over 80%

Asset Sales, In a non-binding referendum Two-thirds of voters, oppose asset sales.  In an outrageous demonstration of arrogance and hubris, the government said it would ignore the result, and Key called the 900,000 voters who rejected his plan “extremists”.  The Ideology of asset sales comes directly from Wall Street. They even have a name for it; the Washington Consensus.

It almost seems as though Mr Key never left Merrill Lynch after all, he simply moved to New Zealand to head up the local branch office.

Fascinating when you consider the prevailing culture of criminality and immorality at Merrill lynch.  The Enron scandal, ML’s leading role in creating the financial collapse of 2008, the payout of $3.6 B dollars in bonuses after posting a loss of 27B. And funding those payouts with taxpayer-funded TARP bailout funds.  And various out or court settlements costing hundreds of Millions of dollars.

The character of Mr Key and his contacts with the criminal elite of international banking still does not fully explain the motives for the behaviour of the National Party over the last eight years. So he’s a ratbag, but why would he deliberately run a country into the ground? Money is an unconvincing motive.

There is another reason.

The Kalergi Plan

The European Union is controlled from Brussels. The objective of the EU is to create a United States of Europe. A super-state of a billion people, ruled by unelected bureaucrats and bankers making their rules and casting their decrees from their glass towers in Brussels.

To that end, they seek to abolish not only the political borders within Europe but also the ethnic identity of the people of Europe. If this sounds like a conspiracy theory, that’s because it is. But it’s more than a theory. The philosophical founder of the EU was Richard Coudenhove  Kalergi. In 1925 he laid out his plans for Europe in his book Practical Idealism in which he said;

“The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today's races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice.

 The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.” 

New Zealanders no longer need to wonder why the vast majority of immigrants are from India and China.
As a final proof of the intentions of the European Union for the European people, please follow the link to the official EU site to promote race mixing, Warning; This site contains explicit sexual information for refugees. Zanzu.


The only New Zealand politician to make any attempt to confront this issue is Winston Peters. In fact, it is only through his efforts that the scandalous 124000 was revealed at all.  So in that sense, I must thank Mr Peters for having the courage to stand up to and confront the liberal agenda of the present government. However as a New Zealand Maori, Mr Peters is probably the only member of the house that could raise the issue without facing the usual avalanche of vapid racist abuse that would automatically fall on any Pakeha taking a similar stance,

It is however still a sad indictment of the state of European culture that we have to rely on a non-European spokesperson to make even the most elementary case for our own civilisation.
============================================================

Sources;
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/national/net-migration-to-nz-hits-new-high/
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11172701
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/71329261/NZ-migration-boom-nears-60-000-a-year-as-Indians-and-returning-Kiwis-flood-in
https://itsourfuture.org.nz/nz-asset-sales-policy-began-on-wall-street/

NZ Media Bias

In 1973 my mother realized she could gain a better life for herself, my sister and I if we emigrated to New Zealand.  Interestingly, one of the deciding factors in my mother’s decision making, even as far back as the early 1970’s was the already apparent social ethnic disharmony in our south London environment.   We arrived in Auckland in January of 1974 to find a largely homogenous white European, nominally Christian society living alongside the existing Maori population. It was peaceful, clean, warm and beautiful. And relative to what we had come from, virtually no crime at all.  As a 13-year-old lad from London, paddling chest deep in the crystal clear, warm waters of the Whangaparoa Peninsula, life was looking very good indeed.

Over the years, we have seen a steady increase in the number of foreigners calling NZ home.

The ubiquitous Indian corner dairy. The Chinese market garden. Now when you go into a bottle shop the chances are high you will be served by another friendly Indian.  That’s right, they are friendly enough in most cases, and I don’t want to imply that the service would be any more or less friendly or the prices any cheaper if the proprietor was of European decent. Their behavior isn’t the point, the point at issue isn’t about them, it’s about us.  It is our survival as a cultural and racial group that is at stake and as such the behavior of other ethnic groups in our society is not the core issue.

  

In amongst the global catastrophe that is gripping the white indigenous populations of the world, it is our identity that is being threatened.  White people are called racists if we resist or speak out against our own soft genocide.

So it's not about them, it is not about the immigrants or any other race, it's about us. It’s about white European people recognizing and wanting to preserve their unique cultural and racial identity and integrity.

The emergence of white identity movements worldwide has been an incredible and from the point of view of our ruling class a completely unexpected development.  After many decades of deliberate denigration of our history and culture, radical egalitarianism and a psychology based education system, it is amazing that there is still a remnant of European consciousness that is able to rise up and claim its rightful place in the history of the world.

But rise up he has done. And the internet is playing a crucial role in white European man’s re-discovery of his history, identity and destiny.  But the television mass media here in New Zealand, as in every other white nation remains the front line in the war against our people.

It is subtle and powerful, but for those of us with eyes to see, it is clear they are becoming ever more obvious and desperate to destroy our will to survive before we have time to gather our forces and overturn the nasty little Marxist platform from which they preach their poisonous ideology.

Here are some specific instances of the anti-white bias that have shown up in the New Zealand media just over the last week.  Each one, taken on its own may appear insignificant and a petty complaint to draw attention to, but viewed in the context of a marketing paradigm where within each message or package of marketing information there exists a subliminal message that contains within itself the real power of persuasion of the message as a whole; they constitute a significant attack on the racial identity of the country.

At the end of TV3’s current affairs program “Story” Last Tuesday 31 May, the presenter announced they were going to close with “some beautiful images of Kiwis who arrived in the country as refugees…”

The images that followed were of an African negro gentleman and a young African woman against a backdrop of photographs of many other refugees who had also come to New Zealand. This was all part of a photographic exhibition taking place in Auckland.  A perfectly laudable enterprise against which no serious person could offer any real criticism.  The second instance was on a show later in the week on the other news channel, TV1 here in New Zealand where a whole segment was dedicated to the lead singer of a popular New Zealand band who had returned home to settle down with his new wife and child.   A completely unremarkable story except for the one glaringly obvious yet unspoken racial aspect of the story.  Jon Toogoods wife is from South Sudan.    

Amid the over-weaning gooing shots of the doting father playing with his new son, one is struck by the obvious fact that this story would never have made the airwaves had it not been for the downplayed racial aspect of the story.

The two stories, taken out of context and individually may seem entirely innocent and innocuous , even though one is prompted to wonder about the motives and priorities of current affairs programming.

However, this writer contends that nothing happens by accident. And  the programming of current affairs television in NZ  is designed with very particular ideological aims in mind.

As with all product marketing and advertising, there is a story and a ‘take-away’. The story is what you see, the main dialog , it’s the froth and glam of the cover story,- the packaging if you will. Then there is the ‘take-away’,  that’s the underlying message that stays with the customer or observer long after the froth has blown away.

And in the case of these two apparently innocent stories of compassion and love, there is the underlying ‘take-away’ that all self-respecting traditional white Europeans should be aware of.

1.     Kiwi’s are from any Race and from any country on Earth. And it does not matter how you got here. Where you came from, or what your cultural, racial or religious background is.

2.      Miscegenation.  If you are white, it is not only desirable but also preferable to marry outside your race.  Doing so ensures your social acceptance amongst your peers, and doing otherwise may even indicate the possibility that you could be a Racist!  That being the very worst of social slurs imaginable.  Horror of horrors, a fate worse than death that you might be on the receiving end of the worst social curse in history, outcast and shunned by your peers for the term of your natural life!

To indicate the ridiculousness of the proposition that a Kiwi is simply anyone who just happens to get here somehow. One only has to perform this simple mental experiment.  I am a white, fair skinned blue eyed middle aged European. Let's suppose I get a long term contract job in China. After a few years I marry a local Chinese girl and get a Chinese passport; am I now a China man?  Of course not!

Same situation if I was to live in the Central African Republic for several years and become a naturalized citizen of that country. Am I now an African ?  When the situation is reversed the stark absurdity of the notion becomes plain for all to see.

Yet in the west, our cultural identity has been so utterly undermined through lack of proper education about our magnificent cultural heritage, that we are rendered completely defenseless against the imposition of soulless Marxist ideologies of radical egalitarianism.

We must learn again to understand that it is normal, healthy right and proper to have a decent respect for your own people, and this in no way implies any denigration of any other people on the face of this earth. This earth already has as much diversity and multiculturalism as would ever be required for us all to live in respect and harmony with each other.  Each with his own people in his own environment.   That said, it has to be acknowledged that Europeans are unique. Despite the many criticisms of European colonialism, the world would be a very dark and barbaric place if not for the art, science, philosophy and sheer brilliance of European creativity.

Finally, I believe it is imperative that self-aware Europeans stand up to and confront every incidence, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant, of this kind of soft denigration of my people.  If we do not, if we believe their subtle lies and misdirections.  If we turn the other cheek and play down the fractious condescending insults, while all the time the liberals work for our destruction then that is exactly what the future will hold.  And that cannot be allowed to happen. 

Macatak

My Journey

Below is a short piece written in early 2015 describing how I became interested in political affairs.

In 2000 I was not a political animal at all.  I was concerned in my life only with my own small circle of influence, my job, my life and my problems. I barely noticed the political world around me. To my way of thinking at the time, it was not something that affected me personally so why should I be interested, or more specifically; invest my valuable time and energy into something I could have no appreciable impact on in any case.

Then in November 2000 George W Bush was apparently ‘elected’, to the presidency of the United States.  Elected of course was a misnomer that would become obvious in due course.  This event was a kind of epiphany for me. Like out of the corner of my eye, I happened to notice that those weird Americans had decided to elect an orang-utan to the white house!

Remember this was pre 9-11, so the significance was not yet apparent, I merely noticed this strange event and assumed that in four years’ time they would recognise the error of their ways and correct their mistake,- and throw Bush out in the process.

Next stop; September 11, 2001, and all hell broke loose.  Now we have an idiot in the white house,  America under attack and a dangerous Neocon clique pulling all the strings.
Personally, if the election of Bush was the cause of a mild epiphany, then 9-11 was definitely the crossing of the Rubicon.  For me, there was no turning back. The shock and horror at the events of 9-11 turned into a kind of morbid fascination with the ‘Bisaro’ world of US politics.

For those of us outside the cocoon of corporate America, the wall of lies and deceit was clear and obvious to those who would see.   Yet in America, while there were many good people who stood up for truth, there were many more who shouted them down and accused them of “aiding the terrorists”.
For me, looking on from our island in the pacific it all looked just too much. Sad, insane, corrupt to the core.  Above all it was clear, and ever more so as time went by, that those who were elected to represent and to lead, had been bought off and were neither representing or leading the people who elected them.

At the time, I did not know who they were serving. Perhaps their own narrow personal self-interest, or perhaps there was a wider dynamic at play motivating them to serve corporate power structures.
The well-known connection between Dick Cheney and Halliburton could also posit a profit motive for the invasion of Iraq.  The wider military industrial complex stood to benefit from a massive profit bonanza, occasioned by on-going major military operations in the Middle East.
For the people involved, these reasons represented a powerful motive for war.  Looking back now from our standpoint fourteen years later, it is obvious that the US government was taken over by a small group of Neocon elite.

What was not clear early on was the web of motivations behind the neocon ideology. One can look at the "Project for the New American Century – Rebuilding Americas Defences", and come to the conclusion that their ideology may be flawed and full of bellicose hubris, but may still have had the best interests of America at heart.

But lets cut to the chase. The Jewish-Zionist connection.

We can make excuses for these people all day long and look for good intentions and motives in their actions until the cows come home. But we delude ourselves, it's simple.  Their actions were illegal. I only became fully aware of the full depth of the Jewish connection between the Neocons in the Bush administration years later.

Ask who benefits. Israel is the answer. Perhaps one might suggest that there is merely a confluence of interests here. A product of coincidence, that what these neocons thought was good for America also just happened to be very good for Israel as well. A  happy coincidence; what a pleasant surprise..!

Even this bankrupt ideology is a naïve self-delusion. The truth is worse than that.
The Americans seemed to be putting up with an awful lot. Denying what seemed to foreign observers to be a clear cut inside job.

But, to see things from their point of view; to put oneself in their shoes so to speak. What does one do when confronted by a reality, the implications of which are simply too horrible to contemplate.
It’s a self-defense mechanism; when confronted with facts that indicate that agents of a foreign power, have infiltrated your government, and subjugated your domestic and foreign policy to the service of that foreign power. And when doing that, thousands of your own citizens and thousands of your own armed forces personnel and incomprehensibly huge sums of money have been spent, wasted, squandered and murdered, then we do the only thing a sane mind can do,… we don’t believe it!

So this is about my philosophical and intellectual journey. It has become pretty clear to me that the  future prosperity of all nations has become intimately linked to this small basket of issues that affect us all.  The task for those who have woken up to the danger already is to wake up the rest, one man at a time.  And if we each do our job, the spread of awareness will grow exponentially.   Call it what you will, zionist, communists or just left wing liberals, or perhaps some dark and shadowy figures planning a New World Order.  The future is not carved in stone. We can fail and allow a new dark age of slavery and servitude to cover the globe or we can succeed and herald in an age of prosperity that our ancestors could only dream of.

  

A response to the left.

How should a White European respond to the charge of Racism, a charge made simply at the suggestion that he might want to stand up for, and defend the right of his people to exist?

How sad it is that this is even a relevant question in 2016.  But after 70 years of deliberate "population replacement", and the slow and steady march of cultural Marxism through the western world, culminating in the Jewish pièce de résistance of mass forced immigration into the European nations, it is hardly surprising that we are a little confused.

Is it not a basic pre-requisite for our elected leaders to secure the welfare of the people?

This basic assumption is so utterly fundamental to the first principles of government that it has never been deemed necessary to even question our candidates as to whether they even like the people or the country they are standing for.  Yet we have been treated recently to the appalling spectacle of one European leader after another speaking about their own people in the lowest terms of contempt. Whilst at the same time pretending that the savage hordes of African and Arab invaders are poor refugee "children".  And that we have an obligation to accept these people on the basis that;

1. We are privileged white Europeans and we have a moral obligation to open our doors to the less fortunate peoples of the world.

2. We must open our borders because we need more people to provide for the labour demands of our growing economy.

3. We must admit hundreds of thousands of foreign men because our birth rates are too low.  

Each one of these spurious pretensions is thrown up one after another by our governments in an attempt to quench the fires that are beginning to burn ever more ferociously in the hearts and minds of our people, as the realisation dawns on more and more of us that our governments have abrogated their responsibility in the most diabolical of ways. It is our genocide that they seek.

They would not see it that way, and certainly would not call it by that name, but genocide it is none the less.

The United Nations definition of Genocide.
The United Nations Genocide Convention defines it as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group"

Article 2 of the convention defines genocide as

...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2[3]

Clearly, the ones making the allegation of Racism are themselves the racists. If Racism is the attempt to subjugate a given group on the basis of Race alone then those who seek to promote or defend Multiculturalism are practising Racism.

This is clear from the fact that while they may use the somewhat benign sounding word "Multiculturalism", the methods and principles they are using to implement it are clearly genocidal.

Specifically, referencing the UN definition cited above.  

Point a) Killing members of the group;   The promotion of abortion as an acceptable practice in European countries kills millions of babies every year.  There were 1.06 million abortions in the US in 2011. And In Europe, around 30 percent of pregnancies end in abortion.

Point b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; The genocide of Europeans has not reached this level on a wide scale yet, at least not in Europe.  However, the situation in South Africa is a lot worse. Since the ANC came to power in 1994 more than 70,000 White farmers have been murdered.

Point C )  Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;  The key phrase here is ‘conditions of life’,  conditions such as poverty, deprivation, hunger and displacement. Relative to the state of European existence 50 years ago, these things have happened to a greater or lesser extent in many parts of the white world.   

In the same vein, conditions of life are also defined by the state of the institutions that define our way of life; Political, Religious, Educational and social, ie news media and entertainment.

We have seen in the entire Western/European world, the long march of Cultural Marxism through all these pillars of our white European culture.  Cultural Marxism has been applied through the application of Critical Theory; a theory which in practice is no theory at all. It is simply the practice of endlessly criticizing any given idea or principle with the intent only to tear down and destroy.

This is entirely in keeping with a Marxist-Communist ideology which demands the total destruction of society in order to herald in the new Communist workers’ paradise.

Point D ) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; The promotion of abortion as well as the promotion of homosexuality and lesbianism. These things do not happen by accident. There is a deliberate and explicit connection between these things and the deliberate attempt to denigrate and obliterate the white European people.

Point E) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.  As far as I know this has not happened. The thrust of the attack against Europeans is to either stop us from being born or kill us outright. Simply transferring our children to other groups will not do. 

    

The implicit Racism of the Liberals against the European majority finds expression in the educational system where the implementation of politically correct educational standards, affirmative action and social engineering in Education conspire to weaken and disenfranchise the dominant culture. The lack of what is no longer taught is just as dangerous as what is now taught in its place.

The fact that what is not taught is the kind of history and values of our people that made our societies the envy of the world and produced the highest level of art, science and culture in recorded history is completely overlooked by the ideologically driven liberals who seek to create ostensibly well balanced, weak, meek and obedient carbon copy versions of themselves.

Their radical egalitarianism will fail because it’s wrong.  We are not all equal and life is not fair. They may succeed in legislating equal input and opportunity in education but they will never succeed in legislating equal outcomes. All they can do is attempt to mask their failure by lowering the bar for everyone. They favor the stupid at the expense of the smart, promote the morally deviant to the detriment of the moral and honorable, and handicap the strong and the fast so that the slow and the week can feel good about themselves.

These things have not happened in a vacuum, the destruction of our Christian culture would not have happened if that destruction had not been deliberately promoted. The same goes for our educational system which now sees its role more as a molder of attitudes and creator of compliant peons to work at the wheels of the Zionist controlled new world order.  Our political institutions are also deeply infected with the same liberal ideology. Governments no longer see the defense of the people and the integrity of the country as their primary role. They are now the primary change agents in the international push to obliterate white identity as a unique and distinct race among the peoples of the earth.

I do believe the mask, however, is slipping. And when it falls the evil intent of all the diabolical programmes of the Frankfurt school will be revealed for all to see. Cultural Marxism and critical theory, with all their inflated pseudo-intellectualism, will finally be seen as the philosophical frauds that they are, and then consigned in short order, back to the trash from whence they came.