I found the famous Canadian clinical psychologist convincing enough at first. He spoke at length about the evils of post modernism and seemed to appreciate the Western Civilization. He seemed to be well aware of who and what was behind the philosophical movements undermining our world. He railed against postmodernism; he railed against communism. He lambasted taxpayer dollars being funnelled into liberal left-wing neo-Marxist ideologues in the humanities departments of universities. He regarded the greatest achievement of the western tradition to be “the paramount importance of the individual and the divinity of speech” That's an interesting way of putting it though, and in retrospect, it was the first red flag. I would have said Classical Liberal democracy, one man one vote and the sovereignty of the people would be up there in the list of achievements.
The destructive nature
of the Peterson philosophy was evident early on. “It is easily
confirmable that JP is a globalist shill. And it is obvious that the
false philosophy that he is pushing, the con job that he is
attempting to pull is completely and 100 % deleterious to the West.
It is bad for America, it is bad for Americans, it is bad for every
Western European nation.” And “JP is the modern
philosophical equivalent of the serpent in the garden of Eden that is
the West. And like the serpent in the garden of Eden, he is
attempting to destroy the inhabitants “
Voxday
Darkstream 05.13.2018 Jordan Peterson is a Globalist
Shill
12 Rules for Life is probably the most dangerous and depressing book ever placed in the hands of young men looking for direction, meaning and confidence. Dr Peterson is never more animated than when trashing any semblance of pride in being European; any hint of European Identity is mercilessly demonised. The 'Jewish People' on the other hand, have a unique group identity and calling in the world, held up by the good doctor as the "shining city on a hill"—something for us mere goyim to be thankful for.
A Poisonous Message
One of the tactics employed by JP is a variant of the "straw man" argument. In presenting his philosophy, he isn't up against an opposing argument; there are no public intellectuals arguing vociferously against him, indeed, he arbitrarily declares the political Right “Not part of the discussion”, instead he's up against reality itself. So without being able to exaggerate an opponent's argument, he has to construct and exaggerate the diabolical nature of Man, European Man that is and the inevitability of catastrophic world destroying evil if Europeans do not forsake themselves and embrace his 'Radical Individualism'.
To support his contention, he has “warned thousands of students over three decades that the spirit of Auschwitz concentration camp guards dwells in their hearts and that they should do everything in their power to recognize its existence and overcome it.” This is a heavy burden for young men looking for answers to bear, but fear not, for Professor Peterson has the answer... “Strive for humility, because totalitarian pride manifests itself in intolerance, oppression, torture and death. Become aware of your own insufficiency—your cowardice, malevolence, resentment and hatred. Consider the murderousness of your own spirit before you dare accuse others, and before you attempt to repair the fabric of the world. Maybe it’s not the world that’s at fault. Maybe it’s you. You’ve failed to make the mark. You’ve missed the target. You’ve fallen short of the glory of God. You’ve sinned. And all of that is your contribution to the insufficiency and evil of the world” (12 Rules pp214)
A Man Who Should Know Better
Jordan Peterson is a man of extensive reading, thinking and study. He knows better than to be prescribing cultural self negation for European Man. He openly admits to being stuck between a rock and a hard place and absolutely understands the importance, or rather the imperative necessity of culture. From the opening paragraph of Maps of Meaning, “If the structure of culture is disrupted, unwittingly, chaos returns. We will do anything – anything – to defend ourselves against that return.” And from 12 Rules...“A shared belief system, partly psychological, partly acted out, simplifies everyone—in their own eyes, and in the eyes of others. Shared beliefs simplify the world, as well, because people who know what to expect from one another can act together to tame the world. There is perhaps nothing more important than the maintenance of this organisation—this simplification. If it’s threatened, the great ship of state rocks.”
Jordan is even cognizant of the impossibility of what he is prescribing "How could the world be freed from the terrible dilemma of conflict, on the one hand, and psychological and social dissolution, on the other?" That psychological and social dissolution is what happens without the binding identity of shared group culture.
On what basis then does
Jordan Paterson advocate a life philosophy of atomised individualism,
what he calls Radical Individualism, knowing as he does the essential
nature of group belonging? “We are thus eternally caught between
the most diamantine rock and the hardest of place
:loss of
group-centered belief renders life chaotic, miserable,
intolerable
;presence of group-centered belief makes
conflict with other groups inevitable.”
Justified Dissolution
To understand JP's particular brand of Psychosis one can read his books and try to come to grips with his very warped worldview; the normal living of life is horrific, filled with danger, failure and destruction, torture and death, he holds that to be true. Culture and group identity makes life bearable, but in his reading of history, literally guarantees the apocalypse. His third road solution is to deracinate everyone, starting with the Europeans who are apparently the worst of the worst. His solution is to negate the very thing that makes life on Earth bearable just so we can have any life at all. With his worldview and as a clinical psychologist, possibly feeling compelled to come up with a workable "solution" it is not hard to see why he might suffer some extreme angst, to say the least.
JP outlines in Maps of Meaning what he calls the Psychopathology of National Socialists. For JP, National Socialism is a form of insanity and its adherents, psychopaths! He despises the "Far Right" and claims to have been strongly influenced by Freud, Jung and the psychoanalysts. That admission is interesting. Freud and the pseudoscience of psychoanalysis had a specific agenda to undermine the West.
“Step by step, we are learning that Freud has been the most overrated figure in the entire history of science and medicine—one who wrought immense harm through the propagation of false etiologies, mistaken diagnoses, and fruitless lines of inquiry. ” (Crews et al., 1995, pp. 298–299) Quoted in Kevin Macdonald; Culture Of Critique.
“...Freud’s speculations clearly had an agenda. Rather than provide speculations that reaffirmed the moral and intellectual basis of the culture of his day, his speculations were an integral part of his war on gentile culture—so much so that he viewed Totem and Taboo as a victory over Rome and the Catholic Church.” Kevin Macdonald; Culture Of Critique.
JP doesn't just think in extremes, he thinks to extremes. From the foreword to 12 Rules DR Norman Doidge writes “To understand ideology, Jordan read extensively about not only the Soviet gulag, but also the Holocaust and the rise of Nazism. I had never before met a person, born Christian and of my generation, who was so utterly tormented by what happened in Europe to the Jews, and who had worked so hard to understand how it could have occurred.”
He uses his belief in the depravity and innate evil of humanity, sighting 20th century European history as exhibit A, to justify a solution that by his own admission is undesirable and unworkable. His regard for us is clear...“We require rules, standards, values—alone and together. We’re pack animals, beasts of burden. We must bear a load, to justify our miserable existence.”
Some of Jordan's critics ascribe malicious intent, and it's easy to draw that conclusion, but this is a man that utterly believes what he says, not that that fact precludes the possibility of evil intent, but I do not believe a person engaged in an act of deliberate calculated “Evil” would wind themselves into logical knots and dead ends they would merely pursue their evil objectives with glee and excitement! Peterson seems to be very far from glee and excitement. I could be wrong of course but it's entirely possible his mental exertions have driven him to the edge of sanity and beyond. Desperate to do good but driven over the edge by the moral conflicts.
Many great tomes have already been written on the subject of Good and Evil, but a quick muse for the sake of context wont hurt. What is Evil? Is there a global definition that holds true in all contexts? What is evil and destructive, or rather destructive and therefore Evil to one group may very well be good and sane for another. It would seem the concepts of good and evil, sanity and insanity depend to a large extent on context and perspective. Saint Augustine wrote “But living a just and holy life requires one to be capable of an objective and impartial evaluation of things: to love things, that is to say, in the right order, so that you do not love what is not to be loved, or fail to love what is to be loved, or have a greater love for what should be loved less, or an equal love for things that should be loved less or more, or a lesser or greater love for things that should be loved equally.”
Ordering our loves, or prioritising our actions in accordance with the dynamics of our lives. Like circles of influence extending out from ourselves. Perhaps not always exactly the same for everyone, but starting with ourselves and the imperative to provide for our own existence with food, clothing and shelter, we extend out to our partner and our children, then the rest of our family and friends. Beyond that, our local community eventually out to our country and people. It's noticeable that in the confrontation between the Left and the Right, the Leftists will think the Right is Evil, full of what they call just “shitty people”. For the Left, it is a matter of moral good, which therefore justifies any action, including violence, property damage, subversive action, bribery and corruption, i.e., “By Any Means Necessary”. The Right, on the other hand, merely think the left is miss-informed so will often mistakenly try to engage them in discussion, a tactic which seldom ends well. The Left have got their loves out of whack in the mistaken belief that if it is good, right and virtuous to care for your own, then it is even more virtuous to care for the other. The craving for the appearance of virtue can cause the Leftist to prioritise the welfare of the out-group over and above their own children and even above their own self interest for the sake of the appearance of Virtue, thus inverting the order of Loves. The inverting and wrong ordering of the Order of Loves will produce the most extraordinary and insane behavior the like of which we have come to expect from the extreme far Left activists and “Social Justice Warriors”.
When it comes to deciding where the moral good lies in the contemporary West, there is one litmus test we can apply. Our civilisation has become so completely saturated by Jewish ideas, thinking and control that the question of Good and Evil can now be settled by the simple test “is it good for the Jews?”
In this passage from 12 Rules, it is clear Jordan believes atonement is called for: “You may find that if you attend to these moral obligations, once you have placed “make the world better” at the top of your value hierarchy, you experience ever-deepening meaning. It’s not bliss. It’s not happiness. It is something more like atonement for the criminal fact of your fractured and damaged Being. It’s payment of the debt you owe for the insane and horrible miracle of your existence. It’s how you remember the Holocaust. It’s how you make amends for the pathology of history. It’s adoption of the responsibility for being a potential denizen of Hell. It is willingness to serve as an angel of Paradise.” (12 Rules. Pp215) Is it a deliberate, malicious intent to consciously offer a solution to what he sees as the intractable conundrum of group identity that will so weaken one group as to ensure its destruction by any invasive group that does not ascribe to his emasculating ideology?
Regarding the prescription
of Radical Individualism for all...
Kevin Macdonald CofC “As
discussed at several points in this volume, the radical individualism
embodied in the Enlightenment ideal of individual rights is
especially problematic as a source of long-term stability in a
Western society because of the danger of invasion and domination by
group strategies such as Judaism...” Kevin Macdonald CofC
The idea of Radical Individualism could be great in the context of a homogeneous egalitarian society. But you cannot continue to make these same claims to individual sovereignty when confronted by an aggressive out-group. That should be self-evident, yet in the Western world this is exactly what has happened. Led by Corruption from the top, the cries of the people have been ignored.
A Very Jewish Blind Spot
To this writer, it is simply not plausible that Mr Peterson is not aware of the Jewish role in shaping the narrative of the West. The overwhelming Jewish influence on American politics and culture, their singular role in opening the borders in 1965 to large-scale non-European immigration and the ability to control a narrative by virtue of ownership of the news media.
Peterson's naturally inquiring mind becomes strangely compliant and trusting when it comes to Jewish interests and the mainstream narrative of the Second World War. Peterson's famously honest stage presence hit a brick wall when he was asked to comment on the book 200 Years Together by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. He paced the stage, froze, and declared, “I can't do it”. It's a subject he will not address and a hand he will not bite.
When we are young we are fed the default narrative of the poor Jewish victims of pathological German villainy. This seems to have been the impetus that drove a bright young J Peterson to the political Left and the death grip of socialism.
The Deviated Hero
JP, with his incisive and deep knowledge, could have been a tremendous asset to the West in a time of dire need. But this was not to be. He thinks in extremes; life is terrifying and horrific, human beings are naturally evil and monstrous. And his greatest fear, that of white Europeans standing up for themselves, in his view, will inevitably lead to the destruction of the world! But his own advice would indicate otherwise...”When the wakening occurs—when once-naïve people recognise in themselves the seeds of evil and monstrosity, and see themselves as dangerous (at least potentially) their fear decreases. They develop more self-respect. Then, perhaps, they begin to resist oppression. They see that they have the ability to withstand, because they are terrible too. They see they can and must stand up, because they begin to understand how genuinely monstrous they will become; otherwise, feeding on their resentment, transforming it into the most destructive of wishes. To say it again: There is very little difference between the capacity for mayhem and destruction, integrated, and strength of character. This is one of the most difficult lessons of life”.
JP has an almost unbelievable ability to make even the most mundane concepts appear deep, profound and endlessly complicated. Reading his material, one is prone to consider the sanity of the writer; is there really any meaning at the bottom of the well he is plunging? With such endless teasing out of fundamental questions of meaning. The oft seen teasing of fingers in front of his face physically showing us what is going on inside. There is no way JP does not realize the importance of in group identity and cultural consistency; he knows more than anyone the devastating reality of losing one's culture, identity, place and home in this world. His outlook is constantly peppered with Terror unbearable. With this amount of knowledge and insight, why did JP not become a right-wing ethno-nationalist? The case is easy to make, with his verbal intelligence, spiritual insights, understanding of mythology, history and psychology, we could have had a powerful advocate for western civilization and the people that produced it. Dare I say it, a Canadian Jonathon Bowden, able to speak at depth extemporaneously to enraptured audiences the world over! But No, whilst begrudgingly acknowledging that European civilization is the best we've produced, (those positive attributes always generalised out to an amorphous Humanity that had nothing to do with it) he never misses an opportunity to trash in enthusiastic terms any advocacy of European identity. Who got to him? Who filled his head with so much anti-white nonsense. Freud, Contemporary histories and the Left Wing saturated liberal universities? Any pride expressed in being White, and he seems certain the ovens of Auschwitz are only moments away from being fired up once more!
Summary
In summary, Jordan Peterson constructs a false dichotomy. A coin with two sides, on one side you have the mental health and psychological well-being of white Europeans, the security of our lands and the future of Europe and on the other, Global Nuclear annihilation. In his corrupted analysis the one will inescapably lead to the other. His solution is to advance for white Europeans who are already individualistic by nature, the suicidal philosophy of Radical Individualism. Do not resist your displacement, do not fight, do not value your people's culture and history at all, only live by the 12 rules in my book, “Clean your Room” and “Pet a Cat” while your world burns, your daughters raped and your history forgotten.
The simple and obvious solution that good borders make good neighbors doesn't seem to have occurred to Dr Peterson. And how convenient it is that his solution of suicide for the West comports so well with the globalist agenda. Indeed the agenda that ultimately puts one particular highly ethnocentric group at the top of the pyramid in the globalist world to come.
Jordan Peterson has said a lot of good things as a clinical psychologist, on a personal level, many people have benefited from his direct and honest insights. But Jordan Peterson is a politically motivated clinical psychologist, and the moment he crossed over into giving people personal advice based on international political considerations, he became a dangerous liability. And as stated above, the moral conflicts he has brought on himself have almost driven him insane and almost certainly contributed to his ongoing medical problems. And to that extent, an insane psychologist should not be trusted with anything, least of all your mind.
McCabe
Other sources:
Black Pidgeon Speaks.
https://youtu.be/0JWH-uXUbGc
Voxday Darkstream 05.13.2018 Jordan Peterson is a Globalist Shill
https://youtu.be/BiCfEcDw_Dg
