On
the 26th of May Stuff published another anti-white hit piece. A
Reader Report section by Andrew McNaughton entitled “It’s not easy being Pākehā. Stop laughing. It isn’t”
The
opening paragraph presents the psychosis so common in the
contemporary White liberal, one moment talking about Whites in the
third person and then suddenly he is himself again and talking in the
first. If we don't know who we are, and he certainly has a point in
that, then there is a very good reason for the complete lack of group
identity amongst the current White population of this Earth.
All
of us, for almost the entire post-war period, have been fed a diet of
Anti-White Anti-European propaganda. From school to higher education,
and therefore over time the self-negating Whites so produced have
come to completely dominate journalism and the academic professions.
And
now we have this, an astonishingly tone-deaf piece of journalistic
garbage, the point of which is stated at the end; “without
te ao Māori we are culturally nothing. Join in people, just relax
and join in.”
Forget everything, only feel, don't think. The White populations have
been the targets of a classic bait and switch. For years told our
culture is nothing, our race is either nothing, does not exist or if
it does is only evil. Then when we find ourselves believing we have
no culture they present this thin contrivance of a made-over
“culture“, resurrected to suit the globalist aims of a new world order, and we
are expected to accept this as a replacement for the towering
colossus of classical European achievement!
What is being foisted on European people is a thin, watered-down, heavily sanitised and spiritualised nativist culture, almost to the point of being cut from whole cloth when compared to the record of unrestrained slaughter that took place in the years leading up to 1840. In its simplest and most concise form, European culture is the pursuit of excellence. The European spirit cannot be satisfied with being subjugated to a second rate position under this cobbled together ad hoc collection of lies, omissions and selective evidence.
Because
it has been published and because these attitudes are pushed so
relentlessly it is worth confronting and refuting the ignorance that
pieces like this display. Let's take a look at some of the points
made one by one.
"Why
are they threatened by a holistic view of the world, which therefore
automatically includes them? "
There
are two aspects to this, first, there is the attitude of the Tribal elites. Then there is the attitude of the Globalist enablers at the
UN.
The
Maori tribal elite are not pursuing a holistic world view, they are
pursuing supremacy, and are not in the slightest interested in
equality, what they want is cultural hegemony, legal authority and economic power over the existing social structure in this country.
(HePuapua
and Nationalism)
As
for the UN. The entities promoting Tribal rule in New Zealand do not
have a “holistic view of the world”. The United Nations is no
more interested in the welfare of Maori Identified New Zealanders
now than they were interested in the welfare of Blacks in South
Africa or Blacks in America during the civil rights movement of the
50s and 60s. In all cases the people they claimed/claim to be
fighting for are worse off now after UN intervention than they ever
were under a European administration.
Maori
tribal rule does not have a history of holistic governance! John
Robinson's Unrestrained
Slaughter documents
in detail the horrors of internecine violence in a society governed
by a code of mutual destruction.
“There
is a cohort of Pākehā reluctant to embrace anything beyond Māori
tokenism, because it scares them.”
“Why
are some Pākehā afraid of the rise of te ao Māori? “
“Is
this the fear of Pākehā, ...”
“feel
inferior about. “
McNaughton
tries to belittle and trivialize his Pākehā brethren
by suggesting we are scared and fearful. He
misunderstands; it
isn't fear Andrew, it's outrage.
When it comes to fear, there is one thing the ruling globalist elites simply cannot allow to happen. Europeans finding their roots, discovering their identity and establishing anew a reason to go on, to defend our people and our heritage from cultural reprobates like the writer of this appalling piece of cultural vandalism. Resurgent European self-respect would completely derail the globalist agenda. There is a good reason why McNaughton and those of his ilk struggle to find anything of value in their perception of European identity and culture, like all contemporary Europeans, they have been deliberately cut off from their foundations. “Deracinated' means pulled up by the roots and the best way to destroy a people is to cut them off from their history. As Europeans, we have all faced a lifetime of anti-White anti-European propaganda, from the school system and particularly through the Marxist saturated university systems of the western democracies.
The
writer deliberately fails to understand the concept of a cultural
home when it applies to whites but is more than happy to laud the
importance of place, culture and language when applied to Maori. Why
the double standard? The writer is anti-white. Perhaps even without
knowing it they have imbibed the rhetoric and the anti-white
propaganda that currently saturates all aspects of western academia
and media. In this country of course this anti-White "OPINION" (sic) is
mandated by the Public interest Journalism fund. Specifically, media
outlets must toe the line in Multiculturalism and the Maori
Partnership agenda being pursued by the government in order to
partake of the 55 million dollar bribe money.
Imagine
if you can someone of any other cultural group behaving in this way
towards their own people. Would an African American write in such a
belittling and culturally offensive way towards his own people? Or a
Chinese, or an Arab. What about the Jewish people? Obviously not, yet
this White Liberal seems to believe it is perfectly acceptable to
behave in this way towards his own people. To talk about “A
Pākehā's reaction ”
as if he is not one himself is a strange and very sad malaise. He may
well set himself apart but the people he is pretending to be a part
of are lying to him. He is merely a useful ally; a “good White”
who for the time being has proven his credentials. But appeasement
will only ever take you so far and they will treat him with
well-deserved contempt, because the Maori people, unlike Andrew
McNaughton have enough self-awareness to realize this idiotic white
man appeasing them with his groveling platitudes is a traitor to his
kind.
“I
professed a dislike of telling people I am from Invercargill,
Southland. There is nothing going for either of those tedious,
meaningless names. How much cooler to say I am from Waihōpai,
Murihiku. The land at the end of the tail (muri, the end of; hiku,
the tail), now that’s a place to be proud of. “
The
name of Invercargill comes from the Scottish Gaelic inbhir
-river
mouth, and cargill after
Capt'n William Cargill, founder of the Otago settlement.
If
the writer of this piece in Stuff were to take a few minutes he may
also discover a connection to those early settlers. From House
of Names ;
“In
ancient Scotland,
the ancestors of the McNaughton family were part of a tribe called
the Picts.
The name McNaughton is derived from the Pictish name Nechtan. The
Gaelic form of the name is Mac Neachdainn, which means son of
Nechtan.” King
of the Picts.
One
can appreciate the desire to put aside these tribal affiliations and
blend with the new homogeneous mixed tribe of New Zealanders in the
fashion of Hobson's wistful muse “We
are now one people”
But this is not what you are doing and its not what the Maori tribal
elite are doing. We have to keep returning to this and point out that
the facts on the ground do not reflect your rhetoric. You are simply
replacing one culture with another and they are simply using your
gullible self-negation against you.
The
current Labour government is doing everything it can to denigrate the
history of European New Zealanders, glorify Maori history and set up
a dual system of government, it is apartheid in everything but the
legal territorial separation of the people.
This
kind of liberal garbage is actually typical of Liberal Whites who
hail from overwhelmingly white communities, in this case,
Invercargill. They have zero experience of the joys of
multiculturalism and simply take as gospel the culturally Marxist
garbage they are fed at university about the glorious benefits of
mass immigration and the inherent evil of white colonization. Those
in more northern climes tend to have a more realistic view of what is
being done to our country.
