How should a White European respond to the charge of Racism, a charge made simply at the suggestion that he might want to stand up for, and defend the right of his people to exist?
How sad it is that this is even a relevant question in 2016. But after 70 years of deliberate "population replacement", and the slow and steady march of cultural Marxism through the western world, culminating in the Jewish pièce de résistance of mass forced immigration into the European nations, it is hardly surprising that we are a little confused.
Is it not a basic pre-requisite for our elected leaders to secure the welfare of the people?
This basic assumption is so utterly fundamental to the first principles of government that it has never been deemed necessary to even question our candidates as to whether they even like the people or the country they are standing for. Yet we have been treated recently to the appalling spectacle of one European leader after another speaking about their own people in the lowest terms of contempt. Whilst at the same time pretending that the savage hordes of African and Arab invaders are poor refugee "children". And that we have an obligation to accept these people on the basis that;
1. We are privileged white Europeans and we have a moral obligation to open our doors to the less fortunate peoples of the world.
2. We must open our borders because we need more people to provide for the labour demands of our growing economy.
3. We must admit hundreds of thousands of foreign men because our birth rates are too low.
Each one of these spurious pretensions is thrown up one after another by our governments in an attempt to quench the fires that are beginning to burn ever more ferociously in the hearts and minds of our people, as the realisation dawns on more and more of us that our governments have abrogated their responsibility in the most diabolical of ways. It is our genocide that they seek.
They would not see it that way, and certainly would not call it by that name, but genocide it is none the less.
The United Nations definition of Genocide.
The United Nations Genocide Convention defines it as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group"
The United Nations Genocide Convention defines it as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group"
Article 2 of the convention defines genocide as
...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2[3]
Clearly, the ones making the allegation of Racism are themselves the racists. If Racism is the attempt to subjugate a given group on the basis of Race alone then those who seek to promote or defend Multiculturalism are practising Racism.
This is clear from the fact that while they may use the somewhat benign sounding word "Multiculturalism", the methods and principles they are using to implement it are clearly genocidal.
Specifically, referencing the UN definition cited above.
Point a) Killing members of the group; The promotion of abortion as an acceptable practice in European countries kills millions of babies every year. There were 1.06 million abortions in the US in 2011. And In Europe, around 30 percent of pregnancies end in abortion.
Point b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; The genocide of Europeans has not reached this level on a wide scale yet, at least not in Europe. However, the situation in South Africa is a lot worse. Since the ANC came to power in 1994 more than 70,000 White farmers have been murdered.
Point C ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; The key phrase here is ‘conditions of life’, conditions such as poverty, deprivation, hunger and displacement. Relative to the state of European existence 50 years ago, these things have happened to a greater or lesser extent in many parts of the white world.
In the same vein, conditions of life are also defined by the state of the institutions that define our way of life; Political, Religious, Educational and social, ie news media and entertainment.
We have seen in the entire Western/European world, the long march of Cultural Marxism through all these pillars of our white European culture. Cultural Marxism has been applied through the application of Critical Theory; a theory which in practice is no theory at all. It is simply the practice of endlessly criticizing any given idea or principle with the intent only to tear down and destroy.
This is entirely in keeping with a Marxist-Communist ideology which demands the total destruction of society in order to herald in the new Communist workers’ paradise.
Point D ) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; The promotion of abortion as well as the promotion of homosexuality and lesbianism. These things do not happen by accident. There is a deliberate and explicit connection between these things and the deliberate attempt to denigrate and obliterate the white European people.
Point E) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. As far as I know this has not happened. The thrust of the attack against Europeans is to either stop us from being born or kill us outright. Simply transferring our children to other groups will not do.
The implicit Racism of the Liberals against the European majority finds expression in the educational system where the implementation of politically correct educational standards, affirmative action and social engineering in Education conspire to weaken and disenfranchise the dominant culture. The lack of what is no longer taught is just as dangerous as what is now taught in its place.
The fact that what is not taught is the kind of history and values of our people that made our societies the envy of the world and produced the highest level of art, science and culture in recorded history is completely overlooked by the ideologically driven liberals who seek to create ostensibly well balanced, weak, meek and obedient carbon copy versions of themselves.
Their radical egalitarianism will fail because it’s wrong. We are not all equal and life is not fair. They may succeed in legislating equal input and opportunity in education but they will never succeed in legislating equal outcomes. All they can do is attempt to mask their failure by lowering the bar for everyone. They favor the stupid at the expense of the smart, promote the morally deviant to the detriment of the moral and honorable, and handicap the strong and the fast so that the slow and the week can feel good about themselves.
These things have not happened in a vacuum, the destruction of our Christian culture would not have happened if that destruction had not been deliberately promoted. The same goes for our educational system which now sees its role more as a molder of attitudes and creator of compliant peons to work at the wheels of the Zionist controlled new world order. Our political institutions are also deeply infected with the same liberal ideology. Governments no longer see the defense of the people and the integrity of the country as their primary role. They are now the primary change agents in the international push to obliterate white identity as a unique and distinct race among the peoples of the earth.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteGreat stuff
ReplyDelete